Current:Home > StocksFederal appeals court upholds $14.25 million fine against Exxon for pollution in Texas -MoneyMentor
Federal appeals court upholds $14.25 million fine against Exxon for pollution in Texas
View
Date:2025-04-12 19:39:09
A federal court on Wednesday affirmed a federal judge’s 2021 ruling imposing a $14.25 million penalty on Exxon Mobil for thousands of violations of the federal Clean Air Act at the company’s refinery and chemical plant complex in Baytown.
The decision by a majority of the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals rejects Exxon’s latest appeal, closing over a decade of litigation since the Sierra Club and Environment Texas sued the company in 2010.
“This ruling affirms a bedrock principle of constitutional law that people who live near pollution-spewing industrial facilities have a personal stake in holding polluters accountable for non-compliance with federal air pollution limits, and therefore have a right to sue to enforce the Clean Air Act as Congress intended,” Josh Kratka, managing attorney at the National Environmental Law Center and a lead lawyer on the case, said in a statement.
From 2005 to 2013, a federal judge found in 2017, Exxon’s refinery and chemical plants in Baytown released 10 million pounds of pollution beyond its state-issued air permits, including carcinogenic and toxic chemicals. U.S. District Judge David Hittner ordered Exxon to pay $19.95 million as punishment for exceeding air pollution limits on 16,386 days.
“We’re disappointed in this decision and considering other legal options,” an Exxon spokesperson said in response to the ruling.
Baytown sits 25 miles outside of Houston, with tens of thousands of people living near Exxon’s facility.
Exxon appealed and asked Hittner to re-examine how the fine was calculated, including by considering how much money the company saved by delaying repairs that would’ve prevented the excess air emissions in the first place. The company also argued that it had presented sufficient evidence to show that emissions were unavoidable.
In 2021, Hittner reduced the fine to $14.25 million — the largest penalty imposed by a court out of a citizen-initiated lawsuit under the Clean Air Act, according to Environment Texas. Exxon appealed again, challenging the plaintiffs’ standing to bring the lawsuit.
While a majority of the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed Hittner’s 2021 decision on Wednesday, seven members of the 17-judge panel also said they would have upheld the $19.95 million fine.
“The principal issue before the en banc Court is whether Plaintiffs’ members, who live, work, and recreate near Exxon’s facility, have a sufficient ‘personal stake’ in curtailing Exxon’s ongoing and future unlawful emissions of hazardous pollutants,” the judges wrote in a concurring opinion. “We conclude that the district court correctly held that Plaintiffs established standing for each of their claims and did not abuse its discretion in awarding a penalty of $19.95 million against Exxon to deter it from committing future violations.”
The Sierra Club and Environment Texas sued Exxon under a provision in the federal Clean Air Act that allows citizens to sue amid inaction by state and federal environmental regulators. The Texas Commission on Environmental Quality rarely penalizes companies for unauthorized air emissions, a Texas Tribune investigation found.
“People in Baytown and Houston expect industry to be good neighbors,” Luke Metzger, executive director of Environment Texas, said in a statement. “But when companies violate the law and put health-threatening pollution into neighborhoods, they need to be held accountable.”
___
This story was originally published by The Texas Tribuneand distributed through a partnership with The Associated Press.
Disclaimer: The copyright of this article belongs to the original author. Reposting this article is solely for the purpose of information dissemination and does not constitute any investment advice. If there is any infringement, please contact us immediately. We will make corrections or deletions as necessary. Thank you.
veryGood! (72)
Related
- Friday the 13th luck? 13 past Mega Millions jackpot wins in December. See top 10 lottery prizes
- Bull that escaped from Illinois farm lassoed after hours on the run
- Amazon says in a federal lawsuit that the NLRB’s structure is unconstitutional
- Students, here are top savings hacks as you head back to campus
- Tom Holland's New Venture Revealed
- You’ll Want to Add These 2024 Fall Book Releases to Your TBR Pile
- Investigators say Wisconsin inmate killed his cellmate for being Black and gay
- Taylor Swift and Travis Kelce's Kiss After Chiefs NFL Win Is Flawless, Really Something
- Trump suggestion that Egypt, Jordan absorb Palestinians from Gaza draws rejections, confusion
- Texas Republican attorney general sues over voter registration efforts in Democrat strongholds
Ranking
- Travis Hunter, the 2
- Shackled before grieving relatives, father, son face judge in Georgia school shooting
- The Daily Money: Some shoppers still feel the pinch
- Dick Cheney will back Kamala Harris, his daughter says
- Global Warming Set the Stage for Los Angeles Fires
- Forced to choose how to die, South Carolina inmate lets lawyer pick lethal injection
- Nebraska is evolving with immigration spurring growth in many rural counties
- Judge considers bumping abortion-rights measure off Missouri ballot
Recommendation
A Mississippi company is sentenced for mislabeling cheap seafood as premium local fish
Election 2024 Latest: Trump heads to North Carolina, Harris campaign says it raised $361M
A rare 1787 copy of the US Constitution is up for auction and it could be worth millions
Father of Georgia high school shooting suspect charged with murder, child cruelty
Bodycam footage shows high
Dye in Doritos used in experiment that, like a 'magic trick,' created see-through mice
Taylor Swift and Travis Kelce's Kiss After Chiefs NFL Win Is Flawless, Really Something
Judge delays Donald Trump’s sentencing in hush money case until after November election